![]() |
Gauguin as Christ in the Garden, 1889 |
A script of a joint talk given by Henry Lamprecht (my better half!) and me as part of a series on Music and Spirituality at Holy Sepulchre London (The National Musicians Church) on Wednesday 26th March 2025. We veered off script at several points. We were grateful to our friend Ben Schoeman for playing excerpts from Beethoven’s works on the piano.
PHILLIP : In this season of Lent we are called to grow in relationship with God
– through the person of Jesus Christ. But who is Jesus?
In the first few centuries after his crucifixion, fierce debates about who
Jesus was were commonplace – especially amongst his most loyal followers. This
was a time when many conceived of the universe in a dualistic way – a heavenly
sphere existing above the created order below. There were those who felt God
would not demean himself by taking on human flesh – so if Jesus was divine, he
must have only ‘appeared’ human. Others felt that the one true God could not be
both Father and Son – and certainly could not have suffered and died on the
cross. So Jesus must have been fully human but somehow appeared divine – a sort
of model or example for how to live a righteous life – but could not be God
himself.
The matter was settled 1700 years ago at the Council of Nicea, from which emerged
the Nicene Creed – an important statement of Christian belief which affirms
that Jesus was both fully human and fully divine.
But, I think it’s fair to say, musical depictions of Christ seemed to focus on
Christ’s fullness in terms of his divinity rather than his humanity. Until Beethoven
composed his only oratorio – Christ on the Mount of Olives.
HENRY : To illustrate our point, we need examine what came
before and what personal crisis Beethoven faced to truly understand Beethoven’s
manifestation of Jesus on the Mount of Olives.
First I need to transport you back to 1742, to Brook
Street in Mayfair. Handel had arrived in the early 1700s and built a very
successful career in Italian opera. Our ancestors just couldn’t get enough of
Italian opera and throughout the 1710s, 20s and 30s London sustained a number
of opera houses. These houses had a competitive edge and the greatest castrati
were imported from Italy.
The operas were based on classical tales such as Julius
Caesar and every imaginable relationship between Roman, Greek and even Persian
gods. Singers, musicians and composers became very wealthy and none more so
than Handel.
If you want to know more about this, do go visit the Handel
museum at the Foundling Hospital in Bloomsbury. When Handel died in 1759 at the
ripe old age of 74 he left behind and estate that today would run to hundreds
of millions of pounds. His handwritten will with very interesting codicils is
on display there as is a manuscript of the Messiah.
But back to 1742… audiences are fickle and the fashion
changed. The English had enough of incomprehensible Italian operas and the
prima donna castrati. Opera seasons flopped and Handel had to reinvent himself.
This he did by turning to a reinvention of an older form, the oratorio - a
setting of a biblical text that follows roughly the same pattern as an opera
but in English and with more use of a chorus commenting on the action. This
proved to be a very popular form and some of those works, like the Messiah and
Israel in Egypt became a staple of standard repertoire. It is astonishing to
think that the Messiah has never been out of repertoire and Handel, 266 years
after his death still plays the rent for many a musician at Easter and
Christmas with performances of this great work.
PHILLIP : The Messiah is obviously all about Jesus – but this work describes
his words and actions using the choir singing as narrators. Jesus himself does
not speak. In Bach’s Passions (of Matthew and John) which predate the Messiah Jesus
is represented by a bass soloist – but the emotional (or human) effects of the
passion are described through the impact on those around Jesus rather than by
himself. This ‘distance’ emphasises Jesus’ divinity – but does it recognise the
fullness of his humanity?
HENRY : Our next stop is 1791 when Haydn arrived in London.
Haydn heard the Handel oratorios that were part of standard repertoire and it
inspired him to write oratorios. First came The Creation; partly based on
Milton’s Paradise Lost in 1798 and then in 1801 The Seasons, based on Scottish
Poet James Thompson’s poems by the same name. Thompson coincidentally also
wrote the words for Rule Britannia.
The texts Haydn set were in German but they were
immediately translated into English. The Creation in particular transformed
Haydn into a bit of a super star and made him a very rich man. Vienna saw
countless performances of The Creation and Beethoven is recorded to have been
present at the first performance of the work in 1799.
It is therefore not surprising that Beethoven turned his
attention to an oratorio of his own. In 1802 Beethoven commissioned a
libretto from the poet Fran’s Xavier Huber who would have been completely
forgotten if it wasn’t for this work. Beethoven wrote Christ on the Mount of
Olives in the summer of 1802 in the space of about two weeks which is very
quick for him as he was generally a slow worker.
But in to the work itself. Beethoven opens the oratorio
with rather dramatic and very dark overture that leads into the first recitative.
Here we find Jesus in the garden of Gethsemane, not at his passion but in the
emotional hours immediately preceding it and as we will see later, there is a
very personal link for Beethoven here.
PHILLIP
: Christ on the Mount of Olives (Christus am Ölberge), as Henry said, was the
only oratorio composed by Beethoven. Unlike other Passion Oratorios, it is set
entirely in the Garden of Gethsemane and, also unusually, rather than using the
voice of an evangelist to narrate the story, places Christ himself in the main Heldentenor
role (heroic tenor voice more closely associated with the works of Wagner these
days.)
Since
the Council of Nicea Christians have affirmed that Jesus is fully human and
fully divine. Part of the controversy over "Christ on the Mount of
Olives" was the way Beethoven portrayed Jesus with many criticising the
work for emphasising his humanity.
The oratorio offers an extended reflection stretching a few short but intense
passages from scripture into a performance that completely envelops the
listener in the agony and anguish of Jesus on the night before his trial and
brutal death. This is a Maundy Thursday Vigil in music; but not a genteel vigil
in a silent candle-lit church with beautiful arrangements by the flower-guild.
Beethoven makes us spend our ‘watch hour’ with a man on the verge of a mental
breakdown.
It is in the Garden of Gethsemane that Jesus accepts His fate: the
inevitability of His own death, in order to fulfil His mission on earth. It was
presented to Him in the form of a cup, from which He must drink. If He were
only a God, there would have been no need to fear, but as a Man, it was
terrifying.
Jesus
did not want to die, and prayed three times: "O my Father, if it be
possible, let this cup pass from me." He looks around at his Apostles, and
they have all fallen asleep. He realises that no-one else is going to do it,
and says to God the Father: "nevertheless not as I will, but as thou
wilt." (Matthew 26:39).
Jesus’s decision to accept the cup is presented here as the climax of his
Passion - Beethoven omits the crucifixion and resurrection; mankind’s atonement
with God starts in the garden, just like our fall. Some felt that portraying
the human side of Jesus undermined his identity as "the Son of God."
For Beethoven, Jesus was also the "Son of Man' as he called himself, and
the human side of Him was often missed. In emphasising Jesus' identity as fully
human, Beethoven is not in any way seeking to undermine His divinity. But in
coming to know Jesus through his humanity we come closer to knowing his divine
nature. We may know him in all his fullness.
To really understand what was going on in Beethoven’s mind while he was setting
the text, we need to go to a very specific date and place. Heiligenstad, a
settlement north of Vienna on 6 October 1802. Beethoven had been losing his
hearing since about 1796 (the earliest reference to him complaining about a
whistling noise in his ears).
As
you can imagine, there is nothing worse than a musician losing their hearing
and Beethoven wrote this testament to his brothers Johann and Carl and gives us
an insight into his mindset at the time he wrote this work.
I
quote for you from the testament:
I was compelled early
to isolate myself, to live in loneliness, when I at times tried to forget all
this, O how harshly was I repulsed by the doubly sad experience of my bad
hearing, and yet it was impossible for me to say to men speak louder, shout,
for I am deaf. Ah how could I possibly admit such an infirmity in the one
sense which
should have been more perfect in me than in others, a sense which I once
possessed in highest perfection, a perfection such as few surely in my
profession enjoy or have enjoyed… what a humiliation when one stood beside
me and heard a flute in the distance and I heard nothing, or someone
heard the shepherd singing and again I heard nothing, such incidents
brought me to the verge of despair, but little more and I would have put an end
to my life — only Art it was that withheld me, ah it seemed impossible to
leave the world until I had produced all that I felt called upon me to produce,
and so I endured this wretched existence — truly wretched, an excitable body
which a sudden change can throw from the best into the worst state… Divine One
thou lookest into my inmost soul, thou knowest it, thou knowest that love of
man and desire to do good live therein… how glad will I be if I can still be
helpful to you in my grave — with joy I hasten towards death — if it comes
before I shall have had an opportunity to show all my artistic capacities it
will still come too early for me despite my hard fate and I shall probably wish
it had come later —
but even then I am
satisfied, will it not free me from my state of endless suffering? Come when
thou will I shall meet thee bravely. — Farewell and do not wholly forget me
when I am dead
We now need to examine how Beethoven treats the text and how he depicts Jesus. The first thing to note is the key. Beethoven uses the key of c-minor. A key he used for some of his post dramatic works:
Ben played the opening of the Pathetique and Symphony 5, opening of Op111)
Jehovah, Thou my Father, as Thou hast power, give me strength to bear!
It
is vital to observe that this theme that appears in the recitative appears 16
years later as the main theme in Op111. Is this Beethoven’s Heiligenstad
prophecy? only Art it was that
withheld me, ah it seemed impossible to leave the world until I had produced
all that I felt called upon me to produce?
The rest of the recitative
text is as follows. I suggest we listen to it now and pay attention to the word
painting and dramatic setting of the deeply meaningful text that is identical
in content to the Heiligenstad testament.
Now in this hour sorrowful is my grief. I have
glorified Thee. Even before Thy command, from chaos the world was formed.
The voices of Thy seraphs now thunder commanding him who dies for men alone to
stand before Thy judgment seat. O Father! I will appear at his
call, to intercede with Thee, to atone, I alone, for guilty man. How can
this feeble race, from dusted created, ever know the feeling that I, Thy only
Son, must now endure? Ah, see the pangs that throb my heart! My
soul is faint, my Father! See how my heart does throb. O pity me!
We now move on to the aria.
I read the text for you:
My soul is afflicted with torments which threaten me;
terror
seizes me, and my whole frame trembles.
I shudder
convulsively with fear of imminent death,
not sweat
but blood drips from my brow. Father, your Son implores you, deeply bowed and
wretched.
All things
are possible to your omnipotence;
take this
cup of sorrow from me! take this cup of sorrow from me! take this cup of sorrow
from me! take this cup of sorrow from me!
Note that
Beethoven repeats the text “take this cup of sorrow from me!” Four times, one
more than the bible.
(Play music)
As you can hear, this is a terrified Jesus in mortal fear. He begs God his
father almost hysterically to “take this cup of sorrow from me!”
This depiction is so vivid, so human that it led to the work being banned in
1825 from where it sank into relative obscurity. It’s only been over the past
few years that conductors such as Kent Ngano, Nicholas Harnoncourt and Simon
Rattle have been reviving it in the concert hall.
Unfortunately, there is no time to explore the rest if the work but if you are
minded to explore it, do compare the aria of the Seraph’s aria with Mit Staunen sieht
das Wunderwerk from The Creation with both arias containing frightening upward
runs for the soprano and The "Welten singen..." finale chorus that has
enjoyed some popularity on its own, usually being rendered as Beethoven’s
Hallelujah and frequently performed by church, high school, and college
choirs.
PHILLIP : Christ on the Mount of Olives is the product of Beethoven’s relationship with the person Christ through the lens of his own suffering. How many people have come to Christ in the same way? Through a period of sickness or illness either in their own lives or those of someone close to them? While the legacy of Beethoven’s approach can be detected in later works – Mendelssohn’s Christus, Stainer’s Crucifixion – none come as close (in our view) to depicting Christ as fully human and fully divine. This Lent as we continue on our journey to come to know Jesus, let us listen more attentively to the settings of the Passion and the other oratorios we hear and allow Christ to speak to us through the music, in all his fullness.
No comments:
Post a Comment